Showing posts with label Big Oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Oil. Show all posts

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Gulf disaster looking worse by the minute

If you like gulf seafood you may be out of luck this summer. Efforts to contain the ever growing oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico have failed so far. Some oil has been burnt off, but just a fraction of what remains, not to mention the hundred thousands of gallons being dumped into the gulf as I write this. A lot of wildlife will perish, sadly. Drill, baby, drill...

CNN

(CNN) -- A huge oil spill oozing toward the Gulf Coast on Thursday threatens hundreds of species of wildlife, some in their prime breeding season, environmental organizations said.

The Coast Guard said Wednesday that the amount of oil spilling from an underwater well after an oil rig explosion last week has increased to as many as 5,000 barrels of oil a day, or 210,000 gallons, five times more than what was originally believed.

Thursday, August 28, 2008

From Congressman Childers

From Congressman Travis Childers in regards to oil speculators, a topic we discussed on the blog earlier this summer:

Last week, the Washington Post published an article about oil speculation and its effect on soaring fuel costs. The story, entitled "A Few Speculators Dominate Vast Market for Oil Trading," discusses how the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) examined the books of one energy conglomerate and found that the company was involved in speculation "as a profit-making investment rather than a means of lining up the actual delivery of fuel."

North Mississippians are struggling to afford high gas prices, and we need to crack down on price manipulators like these that are artificially increasing fuel costs. I strongly support new oil drilling, but preparing drilling sites and building a sufficient number of refineries will take years. Ending speculation, on the other hand, would have an immediate effect on reducing gas prices and providing relief for Americans.

From day one in office, I have fought against oil speculators. My first vote in Congress was to stop oil producers in the Middle East from price gouging Americans at the pump. The Gas Price Relief for Consumers Act of 2008, which passed in the House with overwhelming support, authorizes the U.S. Department of Justice to sue the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) for colluding to limit the production and supply of oil and manipulating prices.

I have also introduced a six-point energy plan to provide immediate relief to North Mississippians from prices at the pump and offer long-term solutions to our nation's energy crisis. The first point in my plan is to stop speculation and price gouging as a means of providing this immediate relief.

As the CFTC findings in the Washington Post article suggest, there is reason to believe that speculation is artificially inflating the price of crude oil and other energy commodities. That's why I supported the bipartisan Energy Markets Emergency Act, which directs the CFTC to use its authority to eliminate excessive oil speculation, price distortion, and sudden or unwarranted changes in prices.

In July, the Agriculture Committee held an investigation on oil speculation. I serve on this Committee and participated in multiple hearings to explore various solutions to inflated prices of oil and other commodities, and to provide a general overview of current legislation to address issues surrounding commodities markets.

By stopping current oil speculation and preventing future price manipulation, we can start to drive down gas prices. I will continue to support and initiate important legislation and investigations that aim to end oil speculation and bring down the cost of fuel for North Mississippians.

Friday, August 1, 2008

Bought by Big Oil

The DSCC launched a new website highlighting the GOP Senators who have been bought by big oil. Right smack dab in the middle of their front page picture is our friend Roger Wicker.

http://www.boughtbybigoil.com/

Tax loopholes that save the oil industry $5 billion were removed from the original Senate version of the $70 billion GOP tax bill in 2006 but under pressure Congressional negotiators put them back in the final bill. The $5 billion for big-oil could have been used instead to partially offset an increase in middle class taxes. Not only did Wicker vote for the final tax bill with the big-oil tax breaks, but he also voted against a Democratic motion to repeal the big-oil tax breaks. [Republican Policy Committee, 2/7/06; Washington Post, 4/26/06; Joint Tax Committee, 5/9/06; Vote 135, 5/10/06; Vote 109, 4/27/06, USA Today, 4/27/06]
They even have some nice graphs that display the profits for Big Oil in contrast with your rising prices at the pump.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Here is what more oil gets you

Sixty more barrels of oil were spilled into the Mississippi today. Now they are finding oil in the mud of the mouth of the river. How much damage to the ecosystem can our area take? How many people as well as wildlife are going to die due to this pollution? How many deaths makes this story relevant to Mississippians who are sitting back while their natural resources are destroyed in the name of big oil? How many?




Who is to blame for high the high price of oil? UPDATED!!

Here is a little history course for those of you with selective memory who think Bill Clinton is to blame for the high price of gas. What is even worse is the false ad produced by the "straight talk express" that lays the blame squarely upon the shoulders of Barack Obama. In a twisted irony the McCain accusation completely refutes his standing claim that Obama did nothing as a Senator and carried no influence in Washington . Well how did he wreck the oil markets then?

In 2001 our Vice President Dick Cheney held secret meetings with unidentified persons to write the Untied States energy policy for the Bush administration. The Bush administration felt like the citizens had no business knowing who was writing their energy policy.

In 2007 some of those names were revealed. Let us all recall that Exxon Mobile has posted record profits several times since this energy policy was enacted. Enron was found guilty of fraud, when they were jacking up the rates on granny, as they so crudely put it.

From the Washington Post:

A confidential list prepared by the Bush administration shows that Cheney and his aides had already held at least 40 meetings with interest groups, most of them from energy-producing industries. By the time of the meeting with environmental groups, according to a former White House official who provided the list to The Washington Post, the initial draft of the task force was substantially complete and President Bush had been briefed on its progress.

In all, about 300 groups and individuals met with staff members of the energy task force, including a handful who saw Cheney himself, according to the list, which was compiled in the summer of 2001. For six years, those names have been a closely guarded secret, thanks to a fierce legal battle waged by the White House. Some names have leaked out over the years, but most have remained hidden because of a 2004 Supreme Court ruling that agreed that the administration's internal deliberations ought to be shielded from outside scrutiny.

...

From the beginning, it was clear that Cheney was running the show, chairing meetings of the task force -- made up of about a dozen Cabinet officers and senior officials -- in his ceremonial office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. Much of the task force's work was done by a six-person staff, led by its executive director, Andrew D. Lundquist, a former aide to Republican Sens. Ted Stevens and Frank Murkowski of Alaska. In 2000, Lundquist was the Bush campaign's energy expert; Bush nicknamed him "Light Bulb."

Today, Lundquist is a lobbyist, and he has represented some of the companies who appeared before the task force, such as BP, Duke Energy and the American Petroleum Institute. He did not return phone calls for this article

Who do we know was there?

1. One of the first visitors, on Feb. 14, was James J. Rouse, then vice president of Exxon Mobil and a major donor to the Bush inauguration

2. A week later, longtime Bush supporter Kenneth L. Lay, then head of Enron Corp., came by for the first of two meetings

3. On March 5, some of the country's biggest electric utilities, including Duke Energy and Constellation Energy Group, had an audience with the task force staff.

4. British Petroleum representatives dropped by on March 22, one of about 20 oil and drilling companies to get meetings.

5. The National Mining Association, the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America and the American Petroleum Institute were among three dozen trade associations that met with Cheney's staff, the document shows.

The list of participants' names and when they met with administration officials provides a clearer picture of the task force's priorities and bolsters previous reports that the review leaned heavily on oil and gas companies and on trade groups -- many of them big contributors to the Bush campaign and the Republican Party. But while it clears up much of the lingering uncertainty about who was granted access to present energy policy views to Cheney's staff, it does not entirely explain why the Bush administration fought so hard to keep it and other as-yet-unreleased internal memos secret.
The price of a gallon of gas was around a $1.50. The prices have nearly tripled under the Cheney-Exxon plan. How did the oil companies fare?

Exxon Mobil posts record profit of $10.7 billion

Record Earnings for Exxon

Shell and BP post record earnings

BP profits jump on back of record high oil prices

Enron Says, 'Oops'

UPDATE from July 31: Exxon breaks own record for biggest-ever profit

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Economic benefits of offshore drilling revealed

Taggart spreading falsehoods about oil drilling in today's Clarion Ledger

"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes."- Mark Twain

In the blogs section of today's Clarion Ledger Andy Taggart insists on spreading misleading information to the readers. Taggart says "Drill here. Drill now. Pay less."

Let's go over this one more time. The U.S. Energy Information Administration concluded as late as 2007 that it would be year 2030 before any minimal effect would be felt at the pumps by increased offshore drilling. The U.S. Energy Information Administration is part of the Bush led Executive branch.

Year 2030. Year 2030. Year 2030. Repeat that until it sinks in.

Now either Andy Taggart is a liar or just misinformed. I find it hard to believe that he is misinformed being a man in his position, so I am going with option A.

Mississippians deserve the truth Mr. Taggart. You don't have to agree with my point of view, but please base your opinions on FACTS, not lies.

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Oil exploration in Madison County

A Texas based oil company is using controlled blasts to explore the earth underneath Madison county to look for oil drilling opportunities. When you ask a lot of Madison residents about drilling off the coast of Mississippi, they say drill, drill, drill and drill now. I wonder how they feel about beautiful Madison being home to constant blasts of dynamite? I also wonder how they feel about having oil production in their backyard, literally and figuratively. What say ye, Madison?

Clarion Ledger story:

In recent weeks, residents have heard loud blasts and seen crews on the ground, and officials with Denbury Resources say there could be a big payoff in store.

Denbury, which has the largest oil and gas presence in Mississippi, has set up seismic survey equipment from Flora to the Ross Barnett Reservoir that uses controlled blasts to create an underground map of the area, looking for carbon dioxide.

The company buys dead oil fields and pumps carbon dioxide into them to produce more oil.
Under normal conditions, about 20 to 40 percent of a reservoir's original oil can be extracted. Using the CO2 technique can push that to 30 to 60 percent.

....

Ashbrooke resident Kim Barlow said the testing should have been publicized more because those who did not know about it could have been scared.

"It was like we were being bombed," she said. "You hear the blasts, and you see this helicopter flying over."

Barlow, who has two children, said she could hear the blasts for about four days.

She worried that, especially with children in the neighborhood, the listening devices could have been dangerous.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

419,000 gallons of oil spilled into Mississippi River

While we sleeping last night a large ecological disaster happened in the Mississippi river around New Orleans. Close to a half million gallons of oil were spilled into the Big River when a barge collided with a Liberian oil tanker. CNN has the story:

The spill is much smaller than the ones that followed Hurricane Katrina in 2005, when the Coast Guard estimated that more than 7 million gallons of oil were dumped into the Mississippi and nearby waterways.

But Wilma Subra, a chemist who advises the Louisiana Environmental Action Network, said the oil could affect wildlife and work its way up the food chain into residents, many of whom fish for subsistence.

"This is a spill that occurred in a very urban area, and it can impact a very large number of people," she said.

The oil, widely used as marine fuel, is heavier than diesel but lighter than crude, and it is likely to stick to rocks, trees and wildlife, Stroh said.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

$2 per gallon?

Congress has been holding hearings on the influence of speculation of the energy-future's markets on the high gas prices, and on Monday, four energy analysts testified that the price per gallon could drop to as much as $2 a gallon within a month of passing a law limiting speculation.

From Market Watch (part of the Wall Stree Journal Digital Network):

Testifying to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Michael Masters of Masters Capital Management said that the price of oil would quickly drop closer to its marginal cost of around $65 to $75 a barrel, about half the current $135. Fadel Gheit of Oppenheimer & Co., Edward Krapels of Energy Security Analysis and Roger Diwan of PFC Energy Consultants agreed with Masters' assessment at a hearing on proposed legislation to limit speculation in futures markets.

Krapels said that it wouldn't even take 30 days to drive prices lower, as fund managers quickly liquidated their positions in futures markets.

"Record oil prices are inflated by speculation and not justified by market fundamentals," according to Gheit. "Based on supply and demand fundamentals, crude-oil prices should not be above $60 per barrel."



Bush appointees Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson & Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman disagree that the price per gallon, which has doubled in one year, has anything to do with speculators. However...

Speculators now account for about 70% of all benchmark crude trading on the New york Mercantile Exchange, up from 37% in 2000, said Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., chairman of the investigations subcommittee.

Our goal should be eliminating our dependence on oil, whether foreign or domestic, and utilizing more environmentally cleaner ways to produce energy and runs automobiles. But in the meantime, I'd love to pay less for gas.

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Big Oil Thad

I thought Roger Wicker's voting record was the worst until I looked at Thad Cochran's. Talk about two peas in a pod. These two guys would not know a sound energy policy if it reached up and slapped them in the face. Cochran like brother Wicker has repeatedly voted in the interests of the GOP's best friend, Big Oil. Thad's senate voting record displays a man who believes progress is achieved by the increase in the bottom line of Big Oil's collective balance sheet. But he gets a lot of really cool pork barrel projects tagged on to bills so I should shut my mouth...

June 2007 - Voted NO on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies

Don't the oil and gas companies make enough money without taxpayer funded subsidies?

June 2005 - Voted NO on reducing oil usage by 40% by 2025 (instead of 5%)

Reducing demand is a terrible idea. No seriously, this is the kind of legislation we are going to have to face. There are solutions to our problems, while not always pleasant they tend to be beneficial in the long run.

July 2003 - Voted YES on Bush Administration Energy Policy

The Energy Policy written by Darth Cheney and all of the executives from the oil and energy companies. This golden oldie brought you classics like the Enron scandal.

March 2002 - Voted YES on terminating CAFE standards within 15 months

CAFE standards are the standards requiring automobile manufacturers to keep an average fuel efficiency for their entire fleet. These standards have been crucial in raising the efficiency of our cars and trucks.

May 2007 - Voted NO on factoring global warming into federal project planning

Global warming what is that?

June 2003 - Voted NO on targeting 100,000 hydrogen-powered vehicles by 2010

Who needs alternative fuels when Big Oil is still here? Just ask Roger Wicker, he will tell you.

I could keep this going for days. Thanks Thad for standing up for Big Oil, I am sure they love you. Maybe they will put you and Roger in the Big Oil Hall of Fame one day.

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Shock Doctrine 101

Gas prices are at an all-time high, oil is over $134 a barrel and steaming towards $200 a barrel and now two very interesting pieces of news from the political world of the oil and gas industry emerge in one week. First, the GOP leadership, manifested by the current President George W. Bush, and the Republican nominee Senator John McCain, make a complete about face on the issue of offshore drilling. Second, after over 30 years in exile, Big Oil finds its way back in to the lucrative business of servicing the gushing Iraqi oil fields.

These separate events, when viewed through a collective lens, offer a perfect example of radical right wing measures being pushed on a populous staggering from the effect of an economic "shock", in what Naomi Klein would describe in detail in her brilliant book "The Shock Doctrine". The most impressive book I have read in quite some time is Naomi Klein's "The Shock Doctrine", and I would highly recommend it to anyone interested in a book on the effects of globalization.

Without giving a complete book review, allow me to give brief insight in to the central premise of "The Shock Doctrine". Klein suggests that extreme right-wing measures such as mass privatization, complete economic deregulation, and the opening of all financial markets to foreign investment, most especially when dealing with the opening of new markets and the expansion of free market capitalism, have always been accompanied by a "shock". The shock may come in the form of a natural disaster, war, or even as an economic shock.

While under the effects of a shock, people are willing to part with freedoms, rights, and public properties, among many others just to bring back a semblance of stability. A perfect example of this phenomenon would be the mass privatization of the New Orleans public schools after Hurricane Katrina. Instead of fixing the publicly owned school system, a for-profit charter school system was created in its place. New Orleans now only has four public schools remaining, yet the taxpayers would not be able to reflect such in their tax bill, since their tax dollars now go to fund the charter schools, something they as citizens have zero stake in. For reference Jackson Mississippi has over 60 public schools in the Jackson Public School District. Certainly the people of New Orleans would have never allowed this grab of public property for private gain had they not been under the stress of as a severe a shock we have seen in the U.S. in modern times.

The rapid rise of the price of oil over the the last few years has created an economic shock now being manifested in the pocketbooks of everyday Americans as well as the rising costs of operation for industry nationwide. People are faced with making hard decisions as the size of their fuel budgets have now risen to levels comparable to their housing and food budgets. Industries are facing the stress of the rising costs of production and distribution.

Americans are notorious procrastinators. Even though many pointy headed intellectuals (Carter, Gore to name a pair) have insisted that we are on borrowed time as an oil-based economy, we have for the most part ignored their advice and continued to enjoy the benefits of artificially low gas prices. Now in a brief seven year period we have seen the price of gas nearly triple. Real economic pain with its accompanying fear of worse pain, is the "shock" now being collectively felt across the country.

Big Oil has made an all out media campaign calling for the immediate opening of ANWR and to lift the moratorium on offshore drilling. The right wing political machine sees a golden opportunity for a political two-for-one. One, they get to make political points with the public by offering a "solution" to the gas price shock, by calling for more drilling. Granted they are counting on an uninformed public, and for a change it looks like the mainstream media is not buying their argument. Two, they get to scratch the backs of one of the most powerful GOP lobbies, Big Oil, and do it under the cover of the "shock".

Some, including our own Haley Barbour, have gone as far as to blame former President Bill Clinton for the current gas prices. Haley is too smart and too well informed to not know that the demand for oil has increased exponentially with the rise of China, Russia, India, and other emerging market based economies. It is not a problem that a small, time consuming increase in supply can adjust, the demand is just growing too fast.

The more people in China trade in their bicycles for automobiles, the higher the demand on oil. What limited resources we have in the United States (3% of the world's supply), does not match with our demand (25% of the world's demand). Besides any free market economist will tell you that the oil gained by Exxon-Mobile or Shell by drilling would go to the global marketplace to be sold at market price. There is no way the shareholders of these oil behemoths are going to allow the sale of oil in the United States at a fraction of market cost just because it was discovered and harvested from the our own soil.

As any right-winger will tell you, the government has no right to interfere with the market. I certainly don't agree with them, but that is certainly their position. So don't be disillusioned by the false prospect of cheap oil just because our oil industries have access to more oil in the U.S. If you truly believe this, I beg you to ask your Republican leaders what they plan to do with this oil that will be owned by Shell, BP and Exxon-Mobile. I doubt anything comes up about protectionism and keeping the profits down by selling cheap at home. The market is their god.

Let us not forget all of our previous discussions on the myths being purported by the right-wing noise machine related to drilling. It will be year 2030 before any real benefits could possibly be felt in the markets due to an increase in supply. Demand is expanding exponentially, so I don't think a modest gain in supply will effect the market more than pennies on a tank of gas. Don't let them fool you, they know this too. But they think you are so distressed about the price of gas that any B.S. story they manufacture around the need for drilling as a panacea to our energy problems, will have you jumping jump in line to support their money grab. Sad, but true.

I thoroughly detailed the thievery going on Iraq by our oil giants of Iraq's most precious resource, its oil. After being shut out of the Iraq market for over 30 years by Saddam Hussein, Big Oil has found the moment they have been waiting for. Like circling vultures, they have descended upon their wounded prey ready to feed. Never mind that the oil belongs to the people of Iraq to profit from, not our oil and gas corporations. While I am not against foreign investment by our energy corporations, I do oppose the plundering of a nation crippled by war. The people of Iraq would never allow this in normal circumstances, and neither would the people of the U.S.

The "shock" of rising gas prices has created the political environment the oil barons have been waiting for to make these outlandish moves. While I do not think Big Oil created the gas "shock", at least not directly with intent, but they are looking to use the pain at the pump felt by regular Americans as a means to push through unpopular legislation and outright thievery overseas. This is "The Shock Doctrine" at its finest.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Mission Accomplished (for real this time)

The front page of the New York Times featured a piece on the takeover of Iraq's precious natural resource by Big Oil. Announced Wednesday was the news that Exxon-Mobile, Shell, BP, and Total were in the final stages of negations on an agreement that would open Iraqi oil to the Western based giants for the first time since Saddam nationalized the oil fields over 30 years ago.

Four Western oil companies are in the final stages of negotiations this month on contracts that will return them to Iraq, 36 years after losing their oil concession to nationalization as Saddam Hussein rose to power.

Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total and BP — the original partners in the Iraq Petroleum Company — along with Chevron and a number of smaller oil companies, are in talks with Iraq’s Oil Ministry for no-bid contracts to service Iraq’s largest fields, according to ministry officials, oil company officials and an American diplomat.

The deals, expected to be announced on June 30, will lay the foundation for the first commercial work for the major companies in Iraq since the American invasion, and open a new and potentially lucrative country for their operations.

The no-bid contracts are unusual for the industry, and the offers prevailed over others by more than 40 companies, including companies in Russia, China and India. The contracts, which would run for one to two years and are relatively small by industry standards, would nonetheless give the companies an advantage in bidding on future contracts in a country that many experts consider to be the best hope for a large-scale increase in oil production.
It has been very clear to a lot of us that this was the endgame in the Iraqi struggle as far as the current administration's interests are concerned. Not to mention the prize for Big Oil is "no bid contracts", per the New York Times. That is right NO BID.

The cowardly theft of Iraq's natural resource by Big Oil is beyond deplorable. Iraq has one thing that will help it regain its stature economically and that is its oil. By allowing Big Oil to in essence steal this from the people of Iraq, in turn we will have allowed the second occupation of Iraq. This one being as morally bankrupt as the first.

Wicker repeats offshore drilling myths

Maybe if you say something enough, people will believe that it is true. That strategy seemed to work well for George W. Bush in the last two election cycles, so I can see where Wicker is coming from. From today's Hattiesburg American,

"With no oil spills in the Gulf of Mexico following hurricanes Katrina and Rita, today's technology has proven we can utilize our domestic energy reserves in a safe and environmentally-sound way," Wicker said.

"Congress should take immediate action to utilize this domestic energy in order to lower gas prices."
We have already shown both of these statements to be categorically false in this post and this post.

From today's New York Times editorial "The Pander to Big Oil"
There is no doubt that a lot of people have been discomfited and genuinely hurt by $4-a-gallon gas. But their suffering will not be relieved by drilling in restricted areas off the coasts of New Jersey or Virginia or California. The Energy Information Administration says that even if both coasts were opened, prices would not begin to drop until 2030. The only real beneficiaries will be the oil companies that are trying to lock up every last acre of public land before their friends in power — Mr. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney — exit the political stage.
Roger, there were oil spills due to Katrina. Just saying that there were not does not change the reality. Gas prices will not be brought down by any drilling until 2030, so stop acting like this a sure fire fix.

Roger, Mississippians are smarter than you think. If you persist in your dishonest political pandering, you will find out just how smart we are in November when you pack your bags and head back to Tupelo.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Debunking another Bush-McCain offshore drilling myth

I have already heard it repeated ad nauseam on the news channels by the remaining members of the famous right wing echo chamber. I even saw a McCain strategist on CNN say this very thing today, so I did a little research. According to the right wing gasbags Hurricane Katrina spilled no oil in the Gulf despite all of the damage. (insert loud buzzer sound here)

The Natural Resources Defense Council had this to say in a 2005 press release post Katrina.

Nearly six million gallons of oil pouring out of seven pipelines and
coastal storage tanks ruptured by Hurricane Katrina amount to one of the largest U.S. oil spills in history.

Major spills so far involve facilities owned by Shell, Chevron, Murphy Oil and Bass Enterprises Production. Offshore, nearly 40 drilling rigs have been destroyed. Some washed up on local beaches, one crashed into a bridge, while others simply disappeared.

By comparison to Katrina, the Exxon Valdez oil spill -- America's largest -- dumped 11 million gallons into Alaska's Prince William Sound.

For any of you doubters out there, since the link in the post is to an environmental website, these are for you.

MSNBC: 44 oil spills found in southeast Louisiana

Guardian: Katrina oil spills may be among worst on record

Dallas Morning News video of Katrina oil spill

McCain flip-flops on offshore drilling, with brother Bush right behind him

John McCain is given a lot of credit by the press for being a political maverick. Whether he is really a maverick or not is going to be one of the major subjects of debate in the coming months. He is in great danger of damaging that maverick reputation with his recent political pandering on our energy crisis.

On Tuesday Senator McCain joined up with Big Oil in calling for the end of the moratorium on offshore drilling. McCain previously had been opposed to any offshore drilling, but in January of this year, while on the campaign trail he said that the decision of whether to drill or not should be made by the individual states. Yesterday he completed the reversal of position in Houston in front of a bunch of Big Oil executives, how appropriate

Within hours George W. Bush followed suit and also called for the end of the moratorium on offshore drilling. What these two jokers aren't telling you is that an increase in offshore drilling will do nothing to help effect the market until 2030. According to the Energy Information Administration, a statistical agency crested by Congress in 1977, it will be year 2030 before any significant impact on the oil market will be achieved by offshore drilling.

Similarly, lower 48 natural gas production is not projected to increase substantially by 2030 as a result of increased access to the OCS.
The real answer is to decrease demand and invest in clean energy research, not pandering to everyday Americans who are hurting at the pump by offering a solution that sounds great but is really just a windfall in profits for the corrupt oil and gas industry. The pander strategy did not work for Senator Clinton on the gas tax holiday and won't work for McCain either. This more than any other election is shaping up to be an election centered on policy. As long as McCain keeps flip-flopping in issues , and worse flopping the wrong way, we Democrats are in good shape.

Oh the irony, John McCain's "I am a global warming hero" ad just came on while I was writing this.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Senator Roger Wicker Voted No On Possible Solutions To Gas And Energy Prices

Roger Wicker voted against the Consumer-First Energy Act that would lower prices at the pump by addressing the root causes of record high gas prices, including rolling back tax breaks for big oil companies and investing in renewable energy. Wicker, who has taken almost $250,000 from the oil and gas companies, voted against the legislation despite the average price of gas in the United States having reached $4 per gallon.

Why did he vote against the bill?

Wicker Has Taken Almost $250,000 From Oil And Gas Industry. Since coming to Congress, Wicker has accepted $248,235 from oil and gas interests.

Jeff chronicled some of his other pro-oil/anti-consumer votes in this previous post.

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Travis Childers on Big Oil

Travis Childers understands that our dependence on foreign oil is a major problem. Childers spoke at at Texaco station in Tupelo on Friday, where he denounced our dependence on foreign oil, and its implications on working class families in Mississippi. The Daily Journal had this to say:

Democratic congressional candidate Travis Childers stopped at a Texaco station here Friday afternoon to denounce rising gas prices and offer solutions if elected to the U.S. House of Representatives."We need to quit depending on foreign oil," said Childers, who is also Prentiss County's chancery clerk. "We need to start depending on ourselves and explore alternative energy sources."As a more immediate strategy, Childers recommended the nation ease the filling of its reserve fuel tanks to boost oil surplus and thereby lower gas prices.At the Texaco station, on the corner of South Gloster and South Green streets, gas prices posted were $3.54 for regular and $3.78 for premium. Childers estimated they were up 25 percent from last year and said some families can't afford to buy fuel anymore."It seems like everyone in Washington is concerned about everything but working-class families," he said. "I'm concerned about working-class families. I'm concerned about north Mississippians."He also said he would not take campaign contributions from big oil companies. Childers and Republican candidate Greg Davis, mayor of Southaven, will meet in a May 13 runoff election after both led an April 22 special election for U.S. House of Representatives' 1st District seat.