Showing posts with label Offshore Drilling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Offshore Drilling. Show all posts

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Gulf disaster looking worse by the minute

If you like gulf seafood you may be out of luck this summer. Efforts to contain the ever growing oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico have failed so far. Some oil has been burnt off, but just a fraction of what remains, not to mention the hundred thousands of gallons being dumped into the gulf as I write this. A lot of wildlife will perish, sadly. Drill, baby, drill...

CNN

(CNN) -- A huge oil spill oozing toward the Gulf Coast on Thursday threatens hundreds of species of wildlife, some in their prime breeding season, environmental organizations said.

The Coast Guard said Wednesday that the amount of oil spilling from an underwater well after an oil rig explosion last week has increased to as many as 5,000 barrels of oil a day, or 210,000 gallons, five times more than what was originally believed.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Drill Here, Drill Now!!

What a sad story that has unfolded in the Gulf of Mexico this past week. First, eleven oil rig workers were killed on an explosion an oil rig in the Gulf. The environmental disaster that is now playing out is a travesty. I remember back when we were having the drill or not to drill arguments on Cotton Mouth a couple of years ago, there was a canard repeated by most of our right wing visitors that there has never been an oil spill caused by an oil rig. What do you guys think now that our precious gulf is in serious danger of an environmental cataclysm?

CNN
The spill continues to grow as 42,000 gallons of oil leaks from an underwater well that was broken open when a drill rig exploded and sank last week. 11 workers are believed to have died in the blast. Their bodies have never been recovered.

The slick stretches for about 100 miles across the north-central gulf and is about 30 miles wide at some points.
It's within 16 miles of the mouth of the Mississippi, the U.S. Coast Guard reports.

Efforts to cap the well using remote-controlled submarines have failed. Louisiana officials fear the oil could reach the state's shoreline late Friday or early Saturday and damage shellfish and wildlife.

BP, which owns the oil well, is spending $6 million a day trying to control the spill. The company's CEO said today the explosion could have been prevented and he's putting them blame on the rig owner Transocean Ltd. A spokesman for Transocean has declined to respond to BP's comments. But Transocean's Vice President has said the oil rig had no signs of a problem before the blast.
It will be interesting to see how many safety violations have occurred in the recent past with this drilling outfit. One would hope it would be better than that of the mine owners involved in the recent mining tragedy. Sadly I will not be surprised if it is as bad or worse.

Update: CNN reports in a breaking news segment that things look a lot worse than originally thought.

CNN Breaking News

The oil spill from last week's deadly rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico has increased to 5,000 barrels a day -- five times more than the original estimate, said Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry.

A third underwater oil leak has been located in the pipeline that connected the rig to the oil well, said Doug Suttles, chief operating officer for BP.

Friday, September 19, 2008

49 Oil Platforms Damaged by Hurricane Ike

One of the many downsides to offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico is the risk of an environmental disaster when you mix drilling and hurricanes. According to today's Clarion Ledger at least 49 oil platforms were destroyed by Hurricane Ike. Three years ago Hurricane's Katrina and Rita destroyed 125 rigs, platforms and pipelines, releasing 685,000 gallons of oil into the environment.

According to the AP story in the Clarion Ledger, the extent of the damage if any environmental damage occurred is not known at this point.

The report by Interior's Minerals Management Service said the agency was conducting helicopter flyovers of the Gulf waters to investigate unconfirmed reports of oil spills and oil sheens, but that it was too early to issue any definitive findings.

"There are no reports of oil impacting the shoreline or affecting birds and wildlife from releases in the Gulf of Mexico federal waters," said the agency.
I have a hard time believing that no oil was spilled by the hurricane, but I will wait and see what they find out. However the Texas Land Commissioner has already declared that no spills occurred. Maybe he should let the Interior Department know so they can call of their flyovers.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

State Senator Lydia Chassaniol repeats myth in Clarion Ledger

One would think a State Senator would be knowledgeable of the facts of an issue in an article they submit to the state's largest nespaper to be published. Senator Chassaniol (district 14) repeats a myth that has been debunked repeatedly to the point that Republicans won't even say it anymore because they know it is not true. We can't have an honest debate on any issue without at first coming to grips with the facts. How you interpret those facts as is your business. Misrepresenting the facts is called lying. As an elected official is it disgraceful to spread falsehoods regarding an issue as important as our energy crisis.

In today's Clarion Ledger's opinion page Senator Chassaniol repeats the myth that China is partnered with Cuba and drilling right off our shore. Even Dick Cheney admits that this is not true. Republican Senator Mel Martinez called the alleged Cuba drilling “akin to urban legend.”

Here are some more links for you Senator Chassaniol:

McCaltchey - GOP claim about Chinese oil drilling off Cuba is untrue

Fox News - Cheney Admits Mistake in Claim of China Drilling Near Florida

FactCheck.org - Are the Chinese drilling off the coast of Cuba?

CBS News - Report: No Chinese Offshore Drilling Near Cuba

Either Senator Chassaniol is ignorant or she is lying. Being that she is a state Senator, I don't know which one is worse. One word, shameful.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Who is to blame for high the high price of oil? UPDATED!!

Here is a little history course for those of you with selective memory who think Bill Clinton is to blame for the high price of gas. What is even worse is the false ad produced by the "straight talk express" that lays the blame squarely upon the shoulders of Barack Obama. In a twisted irony the McCain accusation completely refutes his standing claim that Obama did nothing as a Senator and carried no influence in Washington . Well how did he wreck the oil markets then?

In 2001 our Vice President Dick Cheney held secret meetings with unidentified persons to write the Untied States energy policy for the Bush administration. The Bush administration felt like the citizens had no business knowing who was writing their energy policy.

In 2007 some of those names were revealed. Let us all recall that Exxon Mobile has posted record profits several times since this energy policy was enacted. Enron was found guilty of fraud, when they were jacking up the rates on granny, as they so crudely put it.

From the Washington Post:

A confidential list prepared by the Bush administration shows that Cheney and his aides had already held at least 40 meetings with interest groups, most of them from energy-producing industries. By the time of the meeting with environmental groups, according to a former White House official who provided the list to The Washington Post, the initial draft of the task force was substantially complete and President Bush had been briefed on its progress.

In all, about 300 groups and individuals met with staff members of the energy task force, including a handful who saw Cheney himself, according to the list, which was compiled in the summer of 2001. For six years, those names have been a closely guarded secret, thanks to a fierce legal battle waged by the White House. Some names have leaked out over the years, but most have remained hidden because of a 2004 Supreme Court ruling that agreed that the administration's internal deliberations ought to be shielded from outside scrutiny.

...

From the beginning, it was clear that Cheney was running the show, chairing meetings of the task force -- made up of about a dozen Cabinet officers and senior officials -- in his ceremonial office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. Much of the task force's work was done by a six-person staff, led by its executive director, Andrew D. Lundquist, a former aide to Republican Sens. Ted Stevens and Frank Murkowski of Alaska. In 2000, Lundquist was the Bush campaign's energy expert; Bush nicknamed him "Light Bulb."

Today, Lundquist is a lobbyist, and he has represented some of the companies who appeared before the task force, such as BP, Duke Energy and the American Petroleum Institute. He did not return phone calls for this article

Who do we know was there?

1. One of the first visitors, on Feb. 14, was James J. Rouse, then vice president of Exxon Mobil and a major donor to the Bush inauguration

2. A week later, longtime Bush supporter Kenneth L. Lay, then head of Enron Corp., came by for the first of two meetings

3. On March 5, some of the country's biggest electric utilities, including Duke Energy and Constellation Energy Group, had an audience with the task force staff.

4. British Petroleum representatives dropped by on March 22, one of about 20 oil and drilling companies to get meetings.

5. The National Mining Association, the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America and the American Petroleum Institute were among three dozen trade associations that met with Cheney's staff, the document shows.

The list of participants' names and when they met with administration officials provides a clearer picture of the task force's priorities and bolsters previous reports that the review leaned heavily on oil and gas companies and on trade groups -- many of them big contributors to the Bush campaign and the Republican Party. But while it clears up much of the lingering uncertainty about who was granted access to present energy policy views to Cheney's staff, it does not entirely explain why the Bush administration fought so hard to keep it and other as-yet-unreleased internal memos secret.
The price of a gallon of gas was around a $1.50. The prices have nearly tripled under the Cheney-Exxon plan. How did the oil companies fare?

Exxon Mobil posts record profit of $10.7 billion

Record Earnings for Exxon

Shell and BP post record earnings

BP profits jump on back of record high oil prices

Enron Says, 'Oops'

UPDATE from July 31: Exxon breaks own record for biggest-ever profit

Oil: City of Madison files tresspassing charges against oil companies

The City of Madison filed trespassing charges against Crownpointe Resources, a contractor of Denbury Resources, for not abiding by terms agreed upon. Madison Mayor Mary Hawkins Butler was quoted in the Clarion Ledger as saying "They have no regard for the unanimous vote by our Board of Aldermen, no regard for private property, no regard for city property and no regard for the law."

At dispute is whether or not the oil company can make use of the right of way as well as city property. Denbury is using a technique that involves using controlled explosions to create a seismic survey.

From the Clarion Ledger:

Denbury Resources, the largest oil and gas company in Mississippi, is surveying Madison County for carbon dioxide that could be used to increase oil production.

Crews recently have been setting off about 300 controlled explosions a day and have set up seismic survey equipment from Flora to the Ross Barnett Reservoir.

Madison officials denied permission to use city rights of way, Butler said, but workers set up equipment on city property last week and this week.
The good folks of Madison support drilling, just not in Madison. I wonder how they feel about offshore drilling?

Monday, July 21, 2008

One question for Republicans on ANWR and OCS drilling

Today Roger Wicker declared energy the number one issue. In this article in the Hattiesburg American, Wicker suggest the solution to the problem is more drilling.

Sadly Travis Childers and Ronnie Musgrove join their GOP colleagues Thad Cochran and Roger Wicker in support of offshore drilling. In Childers defense he released a six point plan that included a lot of sound measures like increased funding for alternative fuels, with drilling only being one part of six.

Folks, this is nothing more than a distraction from the real issue facing this country of ending our oil dependence. The George W. Bush appointed Energy Information Administration released a study that I already posted about once. I think this needs repeating. This is related to OCS drilling.

The projections in the OCS access case indicate that access to the Pacific, Atlantic, and eastern Gulf regions would not have a significant impact on domestic crude oil and natural gas production or prices before 2030. Leasing would begin no sooner than 2012, and production would not be expected to start before 2017. Total domestic production of crude oil from 2012 through 2030 in the OCS access case is projected to be 1.6 percent higher than in the reference case, and 3 percent higher in 2030 alone, at 5.6 million barrels per day. For the lower 48 OCS, annual crude oil production in 2030 is projected to be 7 percent higher—2.4 million barrels per day in the OCS access case compared with 2.2 million barrels per day in the reference case (Figure 20). Because oil prices are determined on the international market, however, any impact on average wellhead prices is expected to be insignificant.

That aside I have one big question. Besides a few misguided southern Democrats this is completely a Republican issue. My question to all you Republicans:

Why did you not pass OCS or ANWR drilling during your six year period of dominance? The GOP owned the White House, the Senate, and the House, yet no drilling laws passed. Fast forward to now, and all I hear is that it is Bill Clinton or Barack Obama's fault that we have high gas prices because they opposed drilling. Huh? That does not compute. Someone from the right please explain.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Debunking another Bush-McCain offshore drilling myth

I have already heard it repeated ad nauseam on the news channels by the remaining members of the famous right wing echo chamber. I even saw a McCain strategist on CNN say this very thing today, so I did a little research. According to the right wing gasbags Hurricane Katrina spilled no oil in the Gulf despite all of the damage. (insert loud buzzer sound here)

The Natural Resources Defense Council had this to say in a 2005 press release post Katrina.

Nearly six million gallons of oil pouring out of seven pipelines and
coastal storage tanks ruptured by Hurricane Katrina amount to one of the largest U.S. oil spills in history.

Major spills so far involve facilities owned by Shell, Chevron, Murphy Oil and Bass Enterprises Production. Offshore, nearly 40 drilling rigs have been destroyed. Some washed up on local beaches, one crashed into a bridge, while others simply disappeared.

By comparison to Katrina, the Exxon Valdez oil spill -- America's largest -- dumped 11 million gallons into Alaska's Prince William Sound.

For any of you doubters out there, since the link in the post is to an environmental website, these are for you.

MSNBC: 44 oil spills found in southeast Louisiana

Guardian: Katrina oil spills may be among worst on record

Dallas Morning News video of Katrina oil spill

McCain flip-flops on offshore drilling, with brother Bush right behind him

John McCain is given a lot of credit by the press for being a political maverick. Whether he is really a maverick or not is going to be one of the major subjects of debate in the coming months. He is in great danger of damaging that maverick reputation with his recent political pandering on our energy crisis.

On Tuesday Senator McCain joined up with Big Oil in calling for the end of the moratorium on offshore drilling. McCain previously had been opposed to any offshore drilling, but in January of this year, while on the campaign trail he said that the decision of whether to drill or not should be made by the individual states. Yesterday he completed the reversal of position in Houston in front of a bunch of Big Oil executives, how appropriate

Within hours George W. Bush followed suit and also called for the end of the moratorium on offshore drilling. What these two jokers aren't telling you is that an increase in offshore drilling will do nothing to help effect the market until 2030. According to the Energy Information Administration, a statistical agency crested by Congress in 1977, it will be year 2030 before any significant impact on the oil market will be achieved by offshore drilling.

Similarly, lower 48 natural gas production is not projected to increase substantially by 2030 as a result of increased access to the OCS.
The real answer is to decrease demand and invest in clean energy research, not pandering to everyday Americans who are hurting at the pump by offering a solution that sounds great but is really just a windfall in profits for the corrupt oil and gas industry. The pander strategy did not work for Senator Clinton on the gas tax holiday and won't work for McCain either. This more than any other election is shaping up to be an election centered on policy. As long as McCain keeps flip-flopping in issues , and worse flopping the wrong way, we Democrats are in good shape.

Oh the irony, John McCain's "I am a global warming hero" ad just came on while I was writing this.