What follows is the central claims of the ad and deep background information on the two new claims:
Claim #1: Eaves sued the Navy for conducting training exercises vital to the safety of our troops.
Vieques Island, Puerto Rico is the place this lawsuit concerned.
The Navy used Vieques Island as a live fire bombing range since the Second World War. Over the course of sixty years the Navy bombarded the island -which is a mere 90 square miles- with every type of munition the Navy had in its arsenal. (This included Depleted Uranium a toxic substance which the Navy according to its own regulations was not supposed to use except for in warfare). In the case a former marine testified that they had tested chemicals on the residents of the island without the citizens' knowledge. The results of the Navy's prolonged activities on the Island have resulted in heavy metal contamination of the groundwater, vegetation, shellfish, and marine life which the inhabitants of the Island rely upon. Numerous scientific experts have conducted studies of the Island as well as the effects of the Navy's contamination on the Islanders and have found a direct correlation. In fact the Islanders of Vieques have a 30% higher rate of cancer then the Inhabitants of mainland Puerto Rico which is just 7 miles away from Vieques. The people of Vieques also have higher rates of numerous other disorders which can be linked to mercury, aluminum, cadamium, and other heavy metal contaminants which they were exposed to by the Navy's environmental contamination. In 2005, the Vieques Island site was placed on the EPA's Superfund List of the most hazardous waste sites in the country.
The plaintiffs in the suit, the people of Vieques, are American citizens. "Per capita, Puerto Ricans are amongst the highest in the United States as it relates to volunteering in the armed forces, as it relates to dying in the battlefield, and as to receiving the Congressional Medal of Honor because of their bravery." The people of Vieques were exposed to carcinogenic compounds because of the Navy's negligence. The suit which was brought was solely to compensate the people for the harm done not to stop the Navy's activities. In fact in 2003 - after the war in Iraq had begun - it was President BUSH who ended the Navy's activities on Vieques not Eaves or anyone else.
"There's been some harm done to people in the past. These are our friends and neighbors, and they don't want us there." - Pres. Bush June 14, 2001
Claim #2: Eaves helped "foreigners" sue the Marines.
First in 1998 a Marine Corp fighter pilot flying dangerously and recklessly low to the ground severed a cable which carried a gondola in the Alps. The pilot's actions caused 20 people to plummet 375 feet to the ground and die. The aircraft flown was a EA-6B Prowler and it was not to be flown below a minimum of 1000ft, however the pilot was flying just 375ft above ground. After the event the pilot was charged with involuntary manslaughter, conduct unbecoming an officer along with other charges. The pilot "was sentenced to six months in a military brig and discharged from the service." and the navigator "pleaded guilty to conspiracy and obstruction of justice and was also dismissed from the service." Information into the facts of the case can be found in the case Eyskens v. U.S. 140 F. Supp. 2d 553 (2000).
Claim #3: Eaves falsely attacked Governor Barbour.
The Eaves ad that Barbour is responding to and calling false is what the Barbour ad uses to say that Eaves is falsely attacking Haley Barbour. The problem here is that everything in the ad is sourced. If what is said is untrue Barbour should act to remove the appearance of impropriety. He has failed to do so.
Claim #4: Eaves has no vision for Mississippi.
Barbour has issued no new plans, now vision for what he's going to focus on these next 4 years. Eaves has proposed a plan called "Kid Care" which would cover thousands of Mississippi's children who are currently uninsured or under-insured. He has also stated how he would pay for plans to increase teacher pay and has made his positions on issues far more clear than Haley Barbour. We can debate the merits of one health plan or another or whether the public should be concerned with children's healthcare at all, but to say Eaves has no vision is obviously wrong. A vision right, wrong or indifferent is still a vision.
If you've stayed with me this far I congratulate you. You obviously have patience and if you are like a majority of my readers and are conservative you read something that you knew going in you might disagree with. Feel free to share this and again I had NO contact with the Eaves campaign in writing this. (The last line's for Sid; he doesn't take me at my word though I'd be delighted if he'd check my facts.)
Thank you for summarizing this. As usual, the Barbour brigade is planning to keep repeating this stuff, knowing very few people will have the wherewithal to do the research. It's called propaganda, and he's a master at it.
ReplyDeleteHow many tens of millions did Eaves get from the Navy? Marines? Why did Italy need his help? They already had several firms on the case. I just don't think we need a trial lawyer in office. The more I learn about Mr. Eaves the more he turns me off.
ReplyDeleteUm lest we forget, Barbour is an attorney too. Except he goes to bat for Big Tobacco, Big Insurance, and well those that have a history of preying on the little guy. As Eaves says,"It's a question of whom do you serve?"
ReplyDeleteA correction was made to reflect that the pilot was "discharged from the service" and not "dishonorably discharged."
ReplyDeleteOther changes were made to clarify or to add links to supporting materials.
Eaves' statement on the ad:
ReplyDelete"I'm really shocked," Eaves said of the latest Barbour ad. "Never in a million years did I think Barbour would attack me for standing up for veterans and widows and children who were done wrong by our U.S. government."
I just posted this elsewhere as well. Eaves must be confused as to exactly what kind of "naval" activities were conducted in Puerto Rico:
ReplyDeleteHe said some of the plaintiffs included children “with an extra finger or an extra belly button.”
Seriously. An extra belly button. Belly buttons are not genetic. Pollution (even uranium) will not create an extra belly button. A belly button is a scar from the umbilical cord. Unless he suggests the Navy's testing created mutant mothers who produced double umbilical cords to single babies, then this is just typical trial lawyer hyperbole. What an idiot. People really think this guy should be governor?